Showing posts with label Donald G. Jackson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald G. Jackson. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Zen Filmmaking & Super Hero Zen Cinema From Hawk to Max Hell to Jack B. Quick Space Sheriff

 

By Scott Shaw

 

For obvious reasons, I’ve spoken and writing a lot about my film work with Donald G. Jackson. We created a new brand of cinema, ZenFilmmaking! Whether it was via interviews, through the articles and/or the books I’ve written, or via my teaching seminars and courses on filmmaking, I have presented a lot of the facts about how the films we made, (as a team), were created: the philosophy, the story development, the goings-on behind the scenes, the trials and the tribulations, and all of that kind of stuff. The reason for these presentations are obvious. I mean, let’s face facts, those films, and particularly the Zen Filmmaking philosophy we created, has become a big part of my life.

As I’ve said in the past, Don was a Comic Book guy. Me, not so much. This may have all had a lot to do with where and when we each grew up. Don, in a midwestern, semi-rural/industrial town, Adrian, Michigan, during the 1950s and me on the dark side of L.A. during the 1960s. He evolved one way and me another. He loved the fantasy of the Republic Serials and Comic Books. Me, I was more drawn to the urban nature of Motown and Blaxploitation cinema. We did, however, come together with our love for Spaghetti Westerns, Samurai Cinema, and the abstracts works born from 1960s Psychedelic Cinema.

Due to Don’s love for Comic Books, and Comic Book Cinema; especially on a few of the early Zen Films we created together, there was a Comic Book, Super Hero element presented in each of them.

The main Donald G. Jackson and Scott Shaw films that I can say were the most Comic Book, Super Hero influenced, were: The Roller Blade Seven, Max Hell Frog Warrior, and Guns of El Chupacabra. In each of these cases, it was Don who came up with my character’s name. Where the idea(s) for the character names came from, you would have to ask him, as I don’t know. I just heard them and agreed. Sadly, you can no longer ask him that, however, as he passed away over twenty years ago. The character and the character development were, conversely, created by both of us contributing ideas. We were a dynamic team.

Was Hawk in the Roller Blade Seven a Super Hero? Was Max Hell in Max Hell Frog Warrior a Super Hero? Was Jack B. Quick, Space Sheriff, in Guns of El Chupacabra a Super Hero? Those answers are, of course, debatable. I would say more of an Anti Hero. But, the Super Hero, Comic Book influence is present in each of those characters and active throughout all of those films.

There are truly some grand Super Hero’s in Comic Books and on the Silver Screen. In Comic Books and Graphic Novels, and with films that have large budgets, anything is possible. The sky’s the limit.

In Comic Books, anything can happen. The mind of the creator dreams it, puts it to paper, and the character lives. In high budget films, again, what comes from the mind of the creator can be made into a reality. On films with a shoestring budget, like the Zen Films Don and I made, this is not the case, however. You need to keep your ideas bound by the realms of your reality. The reality of your budget.

So, was what we created in the realm of Super Hero Cinema on par with the Bigs? Of course not. We knew they could never be. Thus, what we presented to the audience were the characters exhibited via the understand that they are living in an abstract reality. What is witnessed by the audience is the intent more than the actualization.

For example, in Armageddon Blvd., we presented a character named, The Rag Doll. Simply her physical movements, and the way she completely embraced her character, was a true presentation of Comic Book Mentality and Cinematic Art. This is the same with the character, Mime Girl, who appeared in a couple of our Zen Films and Music Videos; most notably in, Mimes: Silent But Deadly.

That actress completely embraced her role. To watch both of those actresses, they completely OWNED their characters! True art. True acting.

What I am saying here is that what Don and I created, via the very limited budgets we possessed, was at least partially inspired by his love for Comic Book Culture and our combined love for Artistic Cinema. Thus, though we did not possess the budget to take our productions to the place where they could be compared with the high budget Action Character Genres, what we did was to make Cinematic Art within the constraints or our limited resources.

Aside from Super Hero Central, the Zen Films I made, not in association with DGJ, were not Super Hero Orientated. I was and am far more interested in presenting the urban landscape. As abstracted as my film presentations of that urban landscape may be to some people. Certainly, my Zen Film like Samurai Vampire Bikers from Hell and Samurai JohnnyFrankenstein have a Comic Book quality to them. But, that it is not really their focus. Their focus is human interaction in the character’s living of their life.

More to the point, I believe what we, and particularly I, created was a genre onto itself, defined by nothing created before. Namely, a Zen Film.

Did I ever feel like a Super Hero in those films? No. I knew I was just a guy, with a background in the martial arts, trying to make a piece of Artistic Cinema.

The ultimately question becomes, when you attempt to pigeonhole any artistic project into a specific genre is, are you giving it credence by doing so or are you simply diminishing what it was truly created to be? That’s the question you need to ask yourself whenever you observe any piece of art, via whatever form it may take on. Are you judging it based upon what you believe you already know, via comparing it to projects of a similar category, or are you allowing it to be its own singular presentation, dominated or judged solely on its peculiar unique boundaries of creation?

To take this conversation a bit further, I recently thought about that multi-part parody that was made about Zen Filmmaking and myself, created by students at Grand Valley State University. I popped over to YouTube, where it is presented and found it was filmed seventeen years ago. Wow, time flies!

As I have stated in the past, I never met or conversed with any of the actors or filmmakers associated with that project. Except for one of the participants who contacting me before filming, asking me about where we got the Chupacabra monster, but when I told him that it cost like thirty-thousand dollars to create, I never heard from him again. I wonder where those people are now?

The guy who played Scott Shaw did a very funny portrayal, I thought. As did all of the actors. They truly hit the nail on the head, (as the old saying goes), in their presentation of the wildness of the Zen Filmmaking mindset. Particularly the Zen Films I created in association with Donald G. Jackson.

That parody was done at a time when Zen Filmmaking, Donald G. Jackson, and myself were on the lips of many people in the film industry and the surrounding communities. Times change, however. As is always the case. Now, it seems, not as many people speak about Zen Filmmaking.

Zen Filmmaking is not the only Art-Based and new style of cinema to fall from mass public discussion that rose near the end of the twentieth century. New styles of cinema like Dogme 95 have also seemingly fallen by the wayside.

Still, there are those who do discuss and attempt to describe and pick-apart Zen Filmmaking. The thing about those who do is, they generally get the understanding of Zen Filmmaking and the motivations of Don and myself totally wrong. But, that’s okay, that’s just life. People who aren’t busy living their own life and creating their own brand of cinema, or other artistic endeavors, need something to speak about.

The thing is, at the root, at the heart of all artistic endeavors, is the artist. They are the one(s) who create.

Not everyone is an artist. That’s fine. I’m sure people like that are doing other important things that contribute to this Lifescape. With this being said, as the artist is the creator of that something uniquely their own, this always needs to be at the forefront of any discussion about what that artist created; not simply a judgmental overview about what one individual thinks or interprets or claims to they understand about what and why that artist was doing what they were doing.

Don and I came from vastly different foundations, yet, we came together and created a new style of cinema. Sure, it was me who laid down most of the formation and philosophy for the method. That’s just who I am. Don was way too scatter for all of that. But, it was our coming together that created the inception and the means for this ratified method of filmmaking to be developed. Without that meeting of the minds, the formalization of Zen Filmmaking may never have taken place.

With all creative teams comes the input of the two or more people lending their understanding to the project or the projects they create together. This was the case of Donald G. Jackson and myself. Like George Lucas has stated about the characters he created for Stars Wars, he envisioned himself as the Luke Skywalker character. Though created on a vastly larger scale than anything Don and I ever did, what we each brought to the table was our interpretation of that Hero, Super Hero, Anti Hero, or just that Unique Character that was not just your average Any Body, because no character, in any of our films, was just that average anybody. They were all unique pieces to the puzzle of a cinematic universe created just slightly outside the boundaries of average reality.

I believe that the key to viewing, studying, researching, or discussing any form of cinema, or any type of art, you must step into the mind of the person or persons who are the creator. You must understand it from their perspective; their advantages and their limitations. For if you truly wish to understand the inception and the truth in any piece of art, via whatever form it may take, you must remove yourself from the equation. As is stated in Zen, if you wish to truly understand anything, you must become nothing. For all the things you believe you know, is only your ego talking. You can never know what any other person knows. At best, you can only guess.

If you wish to truly understand and appreciate any art, be silent, let the piece of art be what it is. For there is the only place where a true understanding of art may be gained.

Copyright © 2024—All Rights Reserved

 

This article can also be found on Zen Filmmaking.com @

Zen Filmmaking & Super Hero Zen Cinema From Hawk to Max Hell to Jack B. Quick Space Sheriff

 

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Scott Shaw, Zen Filmmaking, and the YouTube Generation

 By Scott Shaw

Originally from the Scott Shaw Blog 

How much time do you spend on YouTube? No really, how much do you spend on YouTube? I mean, there is a world of free to view Everything on that platform, as well as more how-to stuff than you or I could ever have imagined.

YouTube is really not all that old. It was launched in 2005. That’s just about twenty years ago. Do you even remember life before YouTube? It is kind of hard to do so if you think about it.

Google actually had its own video platform before YouTube. But, it’s gone. Why? Only the powers that be at Google can answer that. It was pretty good.

There were a couple of other sites out there, on the world wide web, before YouTube that used to focus on movies and video presentation. I remember my Zen Filmmaking brother, Donald G. Jackson turned me on to one site, before his untimely passing. He had uploaded his film, Raw Energy to it and suggested that I may want to upload one or more of my Zen Films as well. Which I did. I uploaded the first version of Samurai Vampire Bikers from Hell. So, if you were around back then, and you got to see it then, you were able to view a very-very rare cut of that film. But, that site is long-long gone.

There was no money to be made, on that or other similar sites, like some people now do on YouTube.

I don’t make any money off of YouTube. First of all, I hate those pre and/or during video ads. So, I just don’t want to put viewers of my films through any of that. And also, because a lot of my films, especially my earlier stuff, (the one’s that are the most watched), are Adult Only, so you can’t monetize those anyway. Plus, YouTube doesn’t really pay very much. Not enough to make any difference in my life. So, why bother??? Just keep the Zen Filmmaking flowing for free.

The reality of life is, the days of the VHS, the DVD, and Blu-ray are over. Do you know anyone who watches any of those anymore? I don’t. Not even me. Not unless I am forced to. Now, it’s all about the Streaming. Thus, YouTube rules the game. …YouTube at least for those who don’t want to pay for the other more cash-involved streaming services.

But really… You can find a lot of cool, cutting-edge stuff on YouTube. Stuff that you will not see nowhere else.

So really, how much time do you spend on YouTube? If you don’t spend any, you are probably a more refined soul than myself.

My generalized focus on the platform is music videos and when I need to know how to do what I need to know how to do. It’s a great place to learn it. Also, I like to check out the demos of synthesizers, cameras, and the like. Mostly, there’s always something to learn or to waste your Life Time while viewing.

Zen Filmmaking has a home on YouTube. But, you probably already know that. I’ve uploaded a lot of my and Donald G. Jackson stuff onto the platform. And, it’s up there for FREE! So, if you feel like wasting some time, and maybe delving into the evolution of my style of filmmaking, you can check it out.

Or, and maybe even better yet, you can create your own cinema magic and show the world your creative skills.

YouTube, you can’t live without it. Or, can you?

 

This article can also be found on Zen Filmmaking.com at  Scott Shaw, Zen Filmmaking, and the YouTube Generation.

 

Copyright © 2025—All Rights Reserved

Thursday, August 8, 2024

Zen Filmmkaing: The Art of No Story

By Scott Shaw

Originally from The Scott Shaw Blog

As I state, way too often, there is a rarely a week that goes by that I do not receive questions about (particularly) The Roller Blade Seven, in addition to Max Hell Frog Warrior, Armageddon Blvd., Samurai Vampire Bikers from Hell, Vampire Blvd., Guns of El Chupacabra (which has just been licensed to RiffTrax), and the list goes on and on; you name the Zen Film, I get questions about it. All good! I’m happy to answer, whenever I can. I have had several really good chats about the truth and the realities of the movies and filmmaking in general with some of those people. I also get a lot of question about why don’t I/will I ever do another Roller Blade Seven or Max Hell. Plus, for and from some very astute studiers of the Zen Filmmaking Legacy, I am often asked, will I ever do another story-driven film at all, as I haven’t made a narrative film in about fifteen years?  …And, why did I move away from that style of filmmaking onto the more freeform Non-Narrative Zen Films, that I currently create?

There are a million reasons, of course, all based in my own mind, as I am the artist and the creator of my products. Mostly, it has to do with an ever-evolving freedom of art.

To discuss… I’ve read and heard, ever since I got into the filmmaking game, that the storylines of some of my films don’t make a lot of sense. Whenever I hear or read such a statement, it invokes many amused emotions in me. First of all, if you are saying that, you are not looking too deeply into the story development of that film. But, more importantly, who cares? For those who make such a statement, have you ever even looked into my philosophy about filmmaking and the stories these Zen Films are based upon? If you have, you would have known that one of the primary tenets of Zen Filmmaking is that the stories have already all been told, (so why bother retelling them in a fake-coherent manner), and/or that a story has to be lived before it can be written down. So, allow it to evolve in a natural process, whether it makes sense or not. Look at any of the interviews or discourses I, or Donald G. Jackson, ever gave about Zen Filmmaking, and this premise is made very-very clear. I/we never cared about the story development. It is only used as means and method to create a cinematic work of art revolving around a projected premise. But, that storyline is not essential, in any manner, to the art of that film. Moreover, stop trying to compare a Zen Film to a traditional film. For it is not. It never was intended to be.

What am I saying here? If you are looking for concise story development, a Zen Film is intentionally the wrong place to seek that out. If, on the other hand, you are looking for a visual movement of time and space that peeks into a particular altered reality, this is what you may find in a Zen Film.

I mean really, what does a critic do? Answer: Looks for something to criticize. But, is that a conscious place to live your life from? You may love or hate a piece of art. That’s human nature. But, do your homework before you criticize it. Attempt to truly understand any form of art from the place where it was created, not simply defined by whether you like or dislike it, while seeking out the flaws you feel it possesses.

That’s the thing about Zen, seeking the perfection within the imperfection. 

Each artist presents their own interpretation of art in their own unique manner. And, this goes across all genres of the spectrum of art. Once upon a time, abstract art was new and unique. When seeing it for the first time, it was something totally new and different. Sometimes, so different that even to this day, many people do not like or appreciate it as art. But, loved or hated, it is the expression of that artist’s vision of art. This is the same with film art. My cinematic presentations are defined by the fact that the story does not matter, so stop looking for one.

Therefore, in answer to the question(s), would I ever do another story-driven narrative film? Sure, if I found the inspiration and the people to surround the project with positive energy. But, till that time, it is currently my focus to make the undefined Non-Narrative Zen Film. A space where, obviously and intentionally, the story does not matter. 

You can’t criticize the storyline when there intentionally is no storyline. 

 

Copyright 2024—All Rights Reserved

This article can also be found on Scott Shaw.com

@ Zen Filmmaking: The Art of No Story

and

on  Zen Filmmaking.com

@ Zen Filmmaking: The Art of No Story


Friday, September 1, 2023

Studying the Filmmaking of Scott Shaw

 

By Scott Shaw

 

When I first got into the film game, at the ripe old age of thirty-two, I never thought too much about becoming an auteur. Yeah, I was an artist on canvas. So, I certainly understood what art was. Or, at least, what it was supposed to be. Yeah, I was a poet and a novelist, so I understood the construction of words in an art-filled way to tell a story. Yeah, I was a musician, so I understood how you had to play nice with other musical artists if you wanted to be in a band. But, for me, in the early days, I was just doing what I did.

I came into the game at a transitional time in filmmaking. Though film still reigned supreme. And, if you wanted to be considered a, “Real,” filmmaker you could only shoot on film. But, video was starting to make its inroads. With video, though still not cheap to make a movie, it was far cheaper than shooting on film. Thus, the flood gates opened. And, I believe I played a small part in that process.

But, whether it was shot on film or on video, a movie still had to be, “Made.” Someone, “The Filmmaker,” had to get out of bed and make it happen. They had to go through all of the stuff filmmakers have to go through if they hope to get it done. And, this is never easy. It takes a lot of focus and a lot of work.

For some reason, I was either blessed or cursed to have met and worked with Donald G. Jackson early in my emersion into the film game. Though crazed and mentally unstable by most standards, it cannot be denied he was a true artist; a film artist. The combination of him and I, though coming from very different states of minds and seeking very different life outcomes, we did find a balance which ultimately came to focus the direction of my filmmaking and lead to the creation of Zen Filmmaking.

Certainly, the first Zen Film, The Roller Blade Seven came to be a calling card for both of us and especially for me as an emerging filmmaker. It was/is a crazy film. Then, like now, few people get it. But, that’s okay. As far as I can tell, with all of the proceeding movies I have made, it is a work of art; true film art.

When I started out on that film did I plan for it to become what it became? Nope. I thought we would do an action-adventure piece. But, I’ve spoken about all of that elsewhere.

A few years after the creation of RB7, I am told that the film, and the foundational technique and philosophy used to create the film, became the discussion of a few classes on filmmaking, taught at respected university film schools. Nobody ever asked me (or Don) to come and speak about its creation, however. So, I can’t really tell you what was said. But, combine that with the next segment of Zen Films that I created and Zen Filmmaking began to become an expanded topic for discussion. That was all fine with me. 

With the birth of the internet, I used to receive questions all the time about how I did what I did. I also witnessed how some people were actually attempting to make their own Zen Films or redesign my techniques somewhat; shape and adapt them to their own methods. There were even a few people out there proclaiming the technique and did their own “Zen Films.” Great!  “Make it your own,” I would always say. I was even told about a few colleges where the instructor was actually leading a Zen Filmmaking class, having their students create Zen Films. Excellent!

Somewhere along the way, however, it seemed the focus of attention begin to shift. I kind of saw this with the advent of, “Influencer,” or, “Content Creator,” culture. Some people begin to reach out and use the films that other people had created as a sounding board for their own voice, telling their audience what they thought about what. With this, there seemed to arise a focus on the negative. Why? I believe it is because there are a lot of people out there who feel no real sense of self-purpose, so it is far easier to take the drug of hate than positivity, as it provides much more of a rush. With this, I witnessed the films I created shift and become targets instead of studied works of art.

I must intercede here and state, this is not and has not always been the case. I continue to receive a lot of well thought out questions and comments. But, as the focus has been taken off of me, (and Donald G. Jackson who passed away twenty years ago), the voice for Zen Filmmaking, and what it truly represents, has seemingly been taken over by the Content Creators who spout off incorrect facts, focusing on specific segments of the Zen Films simply has a means to draw fault, and create a negative-based appraisal based upon their own specific state of mind. Though they, more often than not, are wrong in their assumptions, many listeners simply choose to believe what they hear with no further research. Thus, they completely overlook the art of the Zen Films.

What I am saying here is, the focus on what Zen Filmmaking truly is has shifted from the realms of academia or true artistic questioning and has become lost to the minds of those who care more about making a name for themselves than in presenting the truth about Zen Filmmaking and the films of Donald G. Jackson and Scott Shaw.

I have spoken and written a lot about Zen Filmmaking over the years. It’s all out there if you wish to seek it out. But, the point that everyone seems to miss is that Zen Filmmaking is a spiritual process. It is about consciously embrace the Zen, permitting the moment to be the only guide, allowing the magic, that can never be planned for, to occur, and accepting the film art that is created for what it is, not what your mind hoped it would be. All of that seems to be lost in the recent discourses. All that seems to be portrayed is attack ads, voiced by someone who wishes to grow their following, not someone with a true vision for the arts and/or analyzing the purity of the process.

So, how does this affect you? What this tells us is that, for those of us who are artists, (whatever that art form may be), or for those of us who love and embrace the arts, we must step beyond the false reality disseminated by those who are not themselves artist or those who do not or cannot truly understand the art in all things creative. We must not allow our minds to be shaped by those with a negative, condescending, or hurtful mindset on any level. If we love art, by whatever name or form, we must understand that art is the creation of the artist. If, like me, that artists has a defined process, we must view that art based upon the understanding of that process. Mostly, as an artist or an art lover, we must embrace the fact that judgment is never the cornerstone of any discussion on or about art, as art can ultimate not be judged. If it is art, if art was the intention in its creation, it must be observed by those standards and simply be allowed to be what it truly is, art.

Never allow the voice of those who base their life appraisal or their life work on negativity and criticism be your guide. Embrace the creative purity of art, by whatever form it takes.

Art is the ultimate art form. Let it be what it is.

 

Copyright © 2033—All Rights Reserved

Originally from the Scott Shaw Blog @ Scott Shaw.com 

Scott Shaw Zen Filmmaking

Tuesday, July 25, 2023

Zen Filmmaking: It’s a Spiritual Process

 

By Scott Shaw

 

I recently wrote a piece about one of those attack ads that a couple of content creators on YouTube did on a (kinda) Zen Film. Thankfully, after I contacted them, they pulled Zen Filmmaking out of their title, as they themselves had claimed it was used solely to get more followers. But, all this and all that brings us to the part and parcel of Zen Filmmaking and the essential essence of the craft that everybody either doesn’t understand or seems to forget. Zen Filmmaking is a spiritual process. It is not just some form of guerrilla filmmaking. Yes, Zen Filmmaking may, during some productions, exist in and on the level of microbudget filmmaking, but that is not its essence nor is it its core. It is all about the process of the creation of a film based in the purest sense of mysticism.

The entire reason Zen is referenced in the title of this style of filmmaking is that it evokes the essence of Zen. It is designed to emulate the space of Mushin, No Mind, the free-flowing nature of allowing all things to be as they are, following the path of least resistance, and the hope for anything to not be anything but what it is.

It’s easy to criticize. Anybody can look at Anything and easily find fault if that is what they are watching for. But, people who operate on that level of life are existing in a space defined by unenlightened negativity.  Sure, many people live their entire existence operating from this life-perspective. But, what does that give back to humanity? Does it make anything any better? No. All it does is to unleash hate. But, what is hate? It is one person casting their harsh judgment onto something else. Whether this is unleashed in a small or a large dose, the outcome is still the same: pain and suffering. The embracing of hurtful negativity, how does that make any level of life any better? It does not.

Whenever I see or hear Zen Filmmaking being discussed by people of this mindset, I always witness the same levels of criticism. But what these people never understand is the dome of magic that takes place for those of us on the set. The freedom of artistic spontaneity. The amazement at perfect situations presenting themselves to us. The cinematic art that is created simply by allowing ourselves to be free in our creative portrayals.

I’m not going to go into detail, spelling out the tenets of Zen Filmmaking, in this little ditty, for I have done that for decades in other places. It’s all out there if you feel like reading it. What I will reemphasis AGAIN is, Zen Filmmaking is a spiritual process. With Zen at its core, and art at its heart, it is a way of displaying an individual’s cinematic vision in the most spiritually-based, art-filled manner possible.

Sure, as a human being you may love or hate what has been produced. That’s human nature. Nobody likes all the art that they encounter. But, if the actual point of a Zen Film’s inception is missed or misrepresented, or simply placed in the realm of something to be judged, the spiritual essence of that Zen Film is lost. It is lost to the judgmental mind of one or more people and from this the cinematic enlightenment that could be found in that production is simply cast to the realms of the lower mind where Satori or Nirvana may never be embraced.

It’s like what Donald G. Jackson used to say in interviews and stuff, “I don’t think most people could do what Scott and I do. They need structure. We just get out there and create.” And, isn’t that what true art is based upon; instantaneous inspiration and creation? I mean, many people base their criticism of Zen Filmmaking on the fact that it does not use screenplays. But, think how many bad independent films you have seen that were based on a script.

So, next time you’re watching a Zen Film, (if you ever do), understand its foundation. In fact, next time you watch any film or look at any art, seek to step beyond your own lower mind of judgement, witness the piece for what it truly is, and experience the spirituality that goes into creating any piece of art.

Your mind, your judgement, should never be the definition of any piece of art. For that denies all that it truly is. It negates the artist’s vision.

Spiritually is everywhere if you simply open your eyes. I am sure in your deepest mind you too speak to God in your own way. Is the way of God based upon you judging all things that you see, all things that you like or don’t like? No. God is the pure light of the all-encompassing everything. A truly spiritual person never judges. Let that be your guide.

Remember, Zen Filmmaking, is a spiritual process. That is its essence. Never allow a Zen Film to be denigrated by the words of those who refused to understand its elemental foundations.

 

Copyright © 2022—All Rights Reserved

 

Friday, July 7, 2023

Zen Filmmaking Frogtown News A Scott Shaw Zen Film Documentary Featuring Julie Strain and Donald G. Jackson

Frogtown News

Step behind the scenes at the 1997 and 1998 American Film Market and watch discussions and interviews with the Zen Filmmaking team of Scott Shaw, Donald G. Jackson, Julie Strain, Kevin Eastman, and others. Click on the title to view the documentary.

Zen Filmmaking - Scott Shaw and Donald G. Jackson Discuss the Cinema Art Form.

Wednesday, November 23, 2022

Max Hell Frog Warrior - The Zen First Cut - Shaw Zen - Zen Filmmaking

 

The never before seen first cut of the Zen Film that became Toad Warrior and evolved into Max Hell Frog Warrior is now on YouTube.

For more information about Max Hell Fog Warrior @ Scott Shaw.com click on the title.

 

Monday, November 8, 2021

Rollergator on YouTube

 

Just wanted to let all you people out there know that we uploaded Rollergator to YouTube. You can watch it in it's entirety. Click on the title.

For more information bout Rollergator @ Scott Shaw.com click on the title. 

Scott Shaw Zen Filmmaking!

Saturday, July 10, 2021

William Smith: Another Great Loss By Scott Shaw

 

By Scott Shaw

 

            Sadly, the great actor, William Smith has passed away. For those of us who are old enough or for those of us who have watched the evolution of independent cinema, we know that Bill has appeared in so many films and TV shows that it is almost impossible to believe.  In the 1960s and into the 1970s he was ultimate badass. He was in so many biker films; it’s not even funny. But, before that he was in westerns. From there he went on to co-star with Clint Eastwood, he fought Kwai Chang Caine in the original TV series Kung Fu, he even took over for Dano on the final season of Hawaii 5-O. The man had a great career!

            I was lucky enough to have worked with him a few times. The first time was on, The Roller Blade Seven. I so remember the night Don Jackson and I went to meet him to talk to him about being in the film. He was homeless then; couch surfing at the home of one actor or another. When we asked him to be in the film, he actually cried, as he was so happy to be offered work.

            When we took him to the set, several days later, his constant mantra was, “Can I go home now, daddy?   Back then, he drank a lot. He had brought an entire gallon jug of vodka with him to the set and continued to drink from it throughout the day. None of this changed his performance, however. He was great.

            We shot with him for a few days on the Roller Blade Seven. Each time he as on the set he brought that great William Smith presence.

            I also got to act with Bill and direct him in my film, The Rock n’ Roll Cops. This story is told elsewhere, but the night we were to work with him, Don was in one of his major fuck with everyone sort of moods.  Don produced the film and shot it for me. Anyway, we had rented a suite at the Bonaventura Hotel in DTLA as a filming location. Don invited everyone to show up. And, I mean everybody. …Telling them they all would be in the film.

            Don and I had been messing around all day and well into the night, when we finally got there, and saw an insane number of people in the suite. Don immediately screamed and yelled and threw and general fit; throwing everyone out. He then fired the guy who was managing the talent, blaming him for allowing so many people to show up. Bill just sat there in disbelief while all this was going on. Don then decided that he didn’t like the fact that Bill had brought along his then girlfriend, later wife, Joanne along.  But, he didn’t have the balls to tell Bill he didn’t want her there. So, without me knowing, he told Bill I didn’t want her there. But, I was fine with it. I liked her! I noticed she was gone and I asked Bill what happened to her? He said, “Don told me you don’t want her here so she went down to the bar.”  When I told him that wasn’t the case, he got up and stormed into bedroom where Don was preparing the camera, jumped on him, and put his hands around his neck in a chokehold. It was just a joke, as he liked Don, but it was a funny sight to see, as he did all that with that pure William Smith intensity. After that, Bill gave a great performance!

            Another funny experience I had with Bill was when he invited Don and I to a private screening of a film he was in. Don also invited another of his friends, who I also knew. Anyway, the film was so bad, and Don’s friend kept making jokes and cracking up throughout it, which caused me to also laugh through most of the film. Believe me when I tell you, the movie was bad. After the film, we are talking to Bill outside, he stated, “Who were those assholes who were laughing, I’d like to kick their ass.”  Of course, this just caused us to smile. 

            With the amount of work Bill did, his legacy is set in stone, or should I say on celluloid. …This, even though much of his later work was shot on video.

            Overall, he was a great guy, a true badass, a great actor, and a very nice person. As I sadly said not so long ago, in regard to the passing of Julie Strain, the Zen Filmmaking family keeps getting smaller. The original team is almost all gone.

            As for Bill, it’s sad. He was a true talent!

            Rest in Peace my Zen Filmmaking brother.

 

Copyright © 2021—All Rights Reserved

 

Originally from the Scott Shaw Blog

Scott Shaw Zen Filmmaking

Friday, December 18, 2020

Movies and the Things You Never Know By Scott Shaw

 By Scott Shaw

            For anyone who has ever created a movie, or any creative project for that matter, there are things that take place that only the people who were there truly understand. For everyone else, it is simply speculation, projection, or guessing, at best. This is why I forever find it troubling when someone describes what took place on the set of one of my films when they were not on the set. They don’t know! Yet, there they are, telling the world what they believed happened. But, it did not.

            People believe. That is one of the realities of life. They hear and they think it to be true. But, look around at life. Look at all the things you have listened to. Think of all the things you have heard. How many of those things were the truth spoken by someone who lived it verses how many of those words were simply someone’s interpretation of what they believed might have happened? Me, personally, whenever I hear someone talking about something they have no true experiential knowledge about, I tune out. Why listen to them? They know nothing!

            I think to some of the movies I have created or been a part of. There is the completed product. There is what the audience sees. There is what the critics interpret and judge. But, so many times I am confronted with the fact that what people construe, what people think they know about what took place behind the scenes is so far off the mark that it is almost impossible to calculate.

            I can think of one film that I have rarely spoken or written about to use as an example…

            In the world of independent filmmaking, there has long been this seeming need to bring people onto a project that have some name recognition. This is most commonly done in order to hopefully boost potential sales.  I have never been a fan of this process. For me, as a filmmaker, I have always been much more happy to introduce the unknown actor to the world. Yes, in some cases, I have become friends with, “Name talent,” so that is a completely other ballgame. But, “The Name,” for name sake, in independent filmmaking, has always proved problematic.

            I remember my Zen Filmmaking brother, Donald G. Jackson, was at the helm of this one film we created. The shooting title for the film was, “It’s Showtime,” but Don never liked that title so I changed it to, “Strip Club Nights.” The script was written by Mark Williams (RIP).

            Don was always a bit Star Struck. Me, growing up in Hollywood and all that… …Seen it all before… Anyway, Don decided to cast Don Stroud. Great guy! Great choice! Plus, the actor who become famous from the movie, Grease and the TV show, Taxi, Jeff Conway for the, “Name talent,” of the film. Now, by this point in time, Jeff had a sorted past and was known to be a problem on the set. Yet, Don wanted him even though I questioned his judgment. On the set, it’s time for Jeff to come on and do his part. He refused to leave his trailer even though he was a paid a lot of money to be there. Everyone was trying to coax him out, to little avail. The guy was obviously high as that is what he did. Don even ended up being a totally dick and yelling at the great actor Don Stroud due to his frustration. If I was Don (Stroud) I would have told him, “Fuck you,” and walked off the set. But, he was a total professional. Conway, on the other hand…

            Anyway, Don finally talked Conway out of his trailer. He delivered a piss-poor performance, constantly forgetting his lines, but that is what you get when you hire a person of his mentality. He wanted to be treated like a star. He wanted to be pampered and babied. He was in the film, he was a, “Name talent,” but at what cost?

            Now, this is a very obscure film. I could go into what happened with the master copies of it and all that but, again, that is just something that if you weren’t there you would never truly understand. In the past, I have been pointed to people who actually viewed the film and have spoken about this film. All I can take is a moment or two of that kind of stuff because immediately I realize they are totally wrong in what they say. They weren’t there! They don’t know! Yet, they talk…

            So, what is all this discourse about? It is about the fact that what YOU live is what YOU live. If you have not lived it, why are you even thinking about it? It was not your life. What you think you know about it is only speculation at best. Why waste your Life Time contemplating anything that you were not a true part of?

            Life is about experiencing. Life is about living your life. If you are attempting to live your life via the doings of someone else, all you have done is to turn your life over to them. You are attempting to live your life through them. What is accomplished by interpreting the experiences of someone else? …Experience you have not and cannot ever truly understanding.

            Live your own life. Experience what you experience. Don’t attempt to chart the anything of anyone else because you were not there. Don’t waste your time attempting to understand it, because you can’t. All you can do is live your own moment as fully as possible. This is the place/the space; the state of mind where living a GOOD life is formed. Forming the Pure Mind is not out there. …Thinking you know and telling the world about something that you never personally experienced. It is found by living a good life as inquisitively and as positively as possible.

            Live your own life. Talk about what you know. Speak about what you have personally experienced. Then your truly knowledge, your inner-realization may be rightly exhibited to the world.

Copyright © 2020—All Rights Reserved

Originally from the Scott Shaw Blog

Scott Shaw Zen Filmmaking